CRITERIA FOR ELEARNING PROGRAMMES EVALUATION

Olimpius ISTRATE

Abstract


Recent concerns of educational policy level exercise a certain pressure on evaluations of educational programs to provide concrete results, comparable, usable to define the most appropriate strategies for development of education. Debates at this level, which need evidences extracted from existing evaluation research reports, are concerning important topics regarding the relationship with new technologies such as: the emergence of a increasingly pronounced digital divide, the need to promote and support the set of skills for 21st Century, as well as the "insufficient experience of radical change in education", computer-assisted instruction being regarded as "the vanguard of the knowledge society”. An important point in continuing this synthetic and general perspective refers to the fact that there are no solutions or "magic" ideas to operate independently of context. Therefore, the principles and suggestions in this article be taken as such and customized according to the level at which the program is implemented, the concrete needs of the target group, type of intervention chosen, the particular education system or targeted curriculum, the results of other complementary programs etc. Such an approach towards a methodological construction is useful as well for the design stage of eLearning programmes, in the actual context of multiplication of initiatives aiming at incorporating new technologies to increase performance and quality of education. The article highlights a number of useful aspects for a better evaluation of elearning programs, starting from the preparedness of the target groups and institutions, then focusing on the object of evaluation, the expected results, the indicators and instruments used in evaluations.


Full Text:

PDF

References


{1} *** e-Europe. An Information Society For All – Communication on a Commision Initiative for Special European Council of Lisbon, 2000.

{2} Balanskat, Anja, Blamire, Roger and Kefala, Stella. The ICT Impact Report: A Review of Studies of ICT Impact on Schools in Europe. European Schoolnet, December 2006.

{3} BECTA. Harnessing Technology Review 2008: The role of technology and its impact on education. London: BECTA. 2008.

{4} Botnariuc, Petre & Silvia Fat (2011) Developing the ICT Skills of Guidance and Counselling Practitioners in Romania. Analysis of the National Context. In: Roceanu, I. (Ed.) The 7th International Scientific Conference eLearning and Software for Education. Bucharest: Editura Universitara.

{5} Chinien, Chris. The Use of ICTs in Technical and Vocational Education and Training. Moscow: UNESCO Institute for Information Technologies in Education, 2003. (Online: http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0013/001330/133024eo.pdf)

{6} Commission of the European Communities. European benchmarks in education and training: follow-up to the Lisbon European Council. Brussels, 2002.

{7} European Commission, Directorate-General for Education and Culture. Basic Indicators on the Incorporation of ICT into European Education Systems. Facts and figures. 2000/01 Annual Report.

{8} Istrate, O. Efecte si rezultate ale utilizării TIC in educaŃie. In: Tehnologii moderne de educaŃie si cercetare. Lucrările ConferinŃei NaŃionale de InvăŃămant Virtual. Bucuresti: Editura UniversităŃii din Bucuresti, 2010.

{9} Istrate, O.; Velea, Simona (2011) Professionalism in the Education System Today. In: Vlada, Marin (ed.) ICVL. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning. Bucharest: University of Bucharest Publishing House.

{10} Kozma, Robert B. National Policies that Connect ICT-based Education Reform to Economic and Social Development. Human Technology, SRI International, University of Jyvaskyla, 2005. (Online: http://www.humantechnology.jyu.fi/articles/volume1/2005/kozma.pdf)

{11} Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development. Education Today: The OECD Perspective. OECD, 2009.

{12} Potolea, D. & E. Noveanu (coord.) Simona Velea, Petre Botnariuc, Cornelia Novak, Olimpius Istrate. Informatizarea sistemului de invăŃămant: Programul S.E.I. Raport de cercetare evaluativă. Bucuresti: Universitatea din Bucuresti, Facultatea de Psihologie si StiinŃele EducaŃiei, 2008.

{13} Toma, Steliana et alii (2009) Teaching in the Knowledge Society: The Impact of the Intel Teach Program in Romania. Bucharest: Agata Publishing House, 2009.

{14} Trucano, Michael. Knowledge Maps: ICT in Education. Washington: Infodev, 2005. (Online: http://www.infodev.org/en/Document.8.pdf)

{15} UNESCO Institute for Statistics. Guide to Measuring Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) in Education. Technical Paper No. 2. Montreal, 2009.

{16} Velea, Simona (2009) Noile tehnologii in educaŃie – intre slogan si impact autentic in activitatea de predare-invăŃare. In: Tehnologii moderne in educaŃie si cercetare, CNIV 2009, Editura UniversităŃii din Bucuresti.

{17} Velea, Simona (2011) ICT in education: responsible use or a fashionable practice. The impact of eTwinning action on the education process. In: Vlada, Marin (ed.) ICVL. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Virtual Learning. Bucharest: University of Bucharest Publishing House.

{18} Vlada, Marin (2009) Utilizarea Tehnologiilor eLearning: cele mai importante 10 initiative si proiecte din Romania (Using eLearning Technologies: the Most Important 10 Initiatives and Projects in Romania). In: Elearning.Romania. Bucharest: TEHNE- Centre for Innovation in Education. Available online: http://www.elearning.ro.

{19} World Bank/ International Bank for Reconstruction and Development. Monitoring and Evaluation of ICT in Education Projects. A Handbook for Developing Countries. Tunis: InfoDev/ IBRD/ World Bank, 2005. (Online: http://www.unescobkk.org/ education/ict/onlineresources)


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


>> JADLET is indexed by EBSCO http://www.ebscohost.com

Published by Romania Advanced Distributed Learning Partnership Lab

>>OPEN JOURNAL SYSTEM

>>How to use this site