SERIOUS GAMES AND E-LEARNING-LEARNING STANDARDS: TOWARDS AN INTEGRATED EXPERIENCE

Maurice HENDRIX, Ian DUNWELL, Petros LAMERAS, Sylvester ARNAB, Panagiotis PETRIDIS, Craig STEWART, Sara DE FREITAS, Per BACKLUND, Fotis LIAROKAPIS

Abstract


Since the emergence of e-Learning-Learning systems, researchers have explored methods to increase their efficacy, and support a wider range of pedagogical approaches. Similarly, the concept of using Game Based Learning, taken commonly to refer to the use of digital games for education, has also been the subject of a substantial volume of research into their pedagogical design and impact. The popularisation of Game Based Learning has occurred in parallel with the establishment of E-Learning systems; however, questions remain on both technical and pedagogical levels as to how games can effectively be integrated into e-Learning systems. Games can differ substantially from other educational media when used as learning resources, as they may combine high-fidelity audio and video content and employ experiential, social, or exploratory pedagogies. Observing that games are not commonly designed to be included in E-Learning-Learning systems, and that most E-Learning-Learning standards at present do not specifically include affordances for Game Based Learning, this paper explores recent advances in standardisation of Game Based Learning descriptions, and their integration with ELearning- Learning standards.


Full Text:

PDF

References


{1} M. Zyda, “From visual simulation to virtual reality to games,” Computer, vol. 38, no. 9, pp. 25– 32, 2005.

{2} T. Marsh, “Serious games continuum: Between games for purpose and experiential environments for purpose,” Entertainment Computing, vol. 2, no. 2, pp. 61–68, 2011.

{3} J. Farmer and I. Dolphin, “Sakai: eLearning and more,” EUNIS 2005-Leadership and Strategy in a Cyber-Infrastructure World, 2005.

{4} M. W. Goldberg and S. Salari, “An update on WebCT (World-Wide-Web Course Tools)-a tool for the creation of sophisticated web-based learning environments,” in Proceedings of NAUWeb, 1997, vol. 97, pp. 12–15.

{5} M. Dougiamas, Moodle. 2004.

{6} J. Daniel, “Making Sense of MOOCs: Musings in a Maze of Myth, Paradox and Possibility,” Journal of Interactive Media in Education, vol. 3, no. 0, Dec. 2012.

{7} D. R. Garrison, E-Learning in the 21st century. Routledge, 2011.

{8} R. McGreal, “Learning objects: A practical definition,” International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning (IJITDL), vol. 9, no. 1, 2004.

{9} C. Rules, “Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules,” 1998.

{10} K. Coyle and D. Hillmann, “Resource Description and Access (RDA): Cataloging rules for the 20th century,” D-Lib magazine, vol. 13, no. 1, p. 3, 2007.

{11} C. E. Lipscomb, “Medical subject headings (MeSH),” Bulletin of the Medical Library Association, vol. 88, no. 3, p. 265, 2000.

{12} W. Mischo, “Library of Congress Subject Headings,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, vol. 1, no. 2–3, pp. 105– 124, 1982.

{13} M. L. Scott and M. L. SCOTT, Dewey decimal classification. Libraries Unlimited, 1998.

{14} L. M. Chan, “Library of Congress Classification,” Cataloging & Classification Quarterly, vol. 19, no. 3–4, pp. 67–87, 1995.

{15} I. McIlwaine, The Universal Decimal Classification. UDC Consortium, 2000.

{16} Dublin Core Metadata Initiative, Dublin core metadata element set, version 1.1: Reference description. 1999.

{17} “DCMI Education Community.” {Online}. Available: http://www.dublincore.org/ groups/education/. {Accessed: 26-Mar- 2013}.

{18} I. L. T. S. Committee, IEEE LOM working draft 6.1. 2001.

{19} A. SCORM, “Advanced Distributed Learning,” SCORM Overview, 2004.

{20} “UNITY: Game Development Tool.” {Online}. Available: http://unity3d.com/. {Accessed: 19- Mar-2013}.

{21} “Advanced Distributed Learning Initiative: The Unity-SCORM Integration Toolkit Version 1.0 Beta.” {Online}. Available: http://www.adlnet.gov/scorm-unity-integration. {Accessed: 19-Mar- 2013}.

{22} L. IMS, “IMS learning design specification,” 2003. {Online}. Available: http://www.ims global.org/learningdesign. {Accessed: 20-Jul-2012}.

{23} D. Burgos, C. Tattersall, and R. Koper, “How to represent adaptation in e-Learning with IMS learning design,” Interactive Learning Environments, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 161–170, 2007.

{24} D. Burgos, P. Moreno-Ger, J. L. Sierra, and B. Fernandez-Manjon, “Authoring game-based adaptive units of learning with IMS Learning Design and e-Adventure,” International Journal of Learning Technology, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 252–268, 2007.

{25} I. S. S. Specification, 1.0. 2003. .

{26} I. G. L. Consortium, IMS content packaging specification. Version 1.2, 2001.

{27} I. QTI, “IMS Question & Test Interoperability Specification,” IMS Global Learning Consortium, 2005.

{28} S. De Freitas and M. Oliver, “A four dimensional framework for the evaluation and assessment of educational games,” Computer Assisted Learning, 2005.

{29} G. A. Gunter, R. F. Kenny, and E. H. Vick, “Taking educational games seriously: using the RETAIN model to design endogenous fantasy into standalone educational games,” Educational Technology Research and Development, vol. 56, no. 5, pp. 511–537, 2008.

{30} J. M. Keller, “How to integrate learner motivation planning into lesson planning: The ARCS model approach,” VII Semanario, Santiago, Cuba, pp. 1–13, 2000.

{31} R. M. Gagne, The Conditions of Learning and Theory of Instruction, 4 Sub. Wadsworth Pub Co, 1985.

{32} B. S. Bloom and Krathwohl, D. R., Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: By a Committee of College and University Examiners. Longmans, Green, 1956.

{33} R. J. Nadolski, H. G. Hummel, H. J. Van Den Brink, R. E. Hoefakker, A. Slootmaker, H. J. Kurvers, and J. Storm, “EMERGO: A methodology and toolkit for developing serious games in higher education,” Simulation & Gaming, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 338–352, 2008.

{34} S. De Freitas and M. Griffiths, “Online gaming as an educational tool in learning and training,” British Journal of Educational Technology, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 535–537, 2007.

{35} C. Harteveld, R. Guimaraes, I. S. Mayer, and R. Bidarra, “Balancing play, meaning and reality: The design philosophy of LEVEE PATROLLER,” Simulation & Gaming, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 316–340, 2010.

{36} E. F. Anderson, C. E. Peters, J. Halloran, P. Every, J. Shuttleworth, F. Liarokapis, R. Lane, and M. Richards, “In at the Deep End: An Activity-Led Introduction to First Year Creative Computing,” Computer Graphics Forum, vol. 31, no. 6, pp. 1852–1866, 2012.

{37} P. Petridis, I. Dunwell, S. de Freitas, and D. Panzoli, “An Engine Selection Methodology for High Fidelity Serious Games,” in 2010 Second International Conference on Games and Virtual Worlds for Serious Applications (VSGAMES), March, pp. 27–34.

{38} M. Pivec and M. Moretti, Game-based learning_: discover the pleasure of learning. Lengerich: Pabst-Science- Publishers, 2008.

{39} M. Hendrix, A. Protopsaltis, C. Rolland, I. Dunwell, S. de Freitas, S. Arnab, P. Petridis, and J. LLanas, “Defining a Metadata Schema for Serious Games as Learning Objects,” in eLmL 2012, The Fourth International Conference on Mobile, Hybrid, and On-line Learning, 2012, pp. 14– 19.

{40} M. Denk, M. Weber, and R. Belfin, “Mobile learning–challenges and potentials,” International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 122–139, 2007.

{41} A. Nijholt and D. Tan, “Playing with your brain: brain-computer interfaces and games,” in Proceedings of the international conference on Advances in computer entertainment technology, 2007, pp. 305–306.

{42} S. Arnab, P. Petridis, I. Dunwell, and S. Freitas, “Enhancing Learning in Distributed Virtual Worlds through Touch: A Browser-based Architecture for Haptic Interaction,” Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, pp. 149–167, 2011.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


>> JADLET is indexed by EBSCO http://www.ebscohost.com

Published by Romania Advanced Distributed Learning Partnership Lab

>>OPEN JOURNAL SYSTEM

>>How to use this site